You've noticed the pattern by now.

Doesn't matter how good your analysis is. 

Doesn't matter how clean the setup looks. 

Doesn't matter if you wait for confirmation or if you're patient with your entry.

Your stop gets hit. 

Then price reverses exactly in the direction you predicted.

Not close to your stop. 

Exactly at it.

And it's always at the round numbers. 1.1000. 1950.00. 0.7500.

Most traders think this is bad luck. 

Some start wondering if the broker is hunting their specific stops.

Neither is true.

But what's actually happening is worse, because it means you're doing exactly what institutional algorithms predicted you would do.

Round Numbers Aren't Psychological Levels

Here's what most trading education gets wrong, 

They tell you round numbers are "psychological levels" where traders make emotional decisions. 

Support at 1.1000 because it's a big number. 

Resistance at 1950.00 because humans like round figures.

That's not what round numbers are.

Round numbers are algorithmic magnets.

Institutional algorithms don't care about human psychology. 

They care about liquidity concentration. 

And the most predictable liquidity concentration in any market happens at round numbers, not because they're psychologically significant, but because that's where retail traders predictably stack their stops.

When you place your stop at 1.1000 because it "feels like a clean level," you're not making an independent risk management decision.

You're joining a cluster.

Thousands of retail traders all making the same "logical" choice, placing their stops at exactly the same level. 

And that cluster is visible. 

Not to a human watching your specific trade. 

To algorithms programmed to hunt exactly those concentrations.

The Three Ways This Destroys You

The exact tag. Price moves to your stop level, touches it within a pip, reverses immediately. You check the chart later, the wick hit exactly 1.0950. Not 1.0948. Not 1.0953. Exactly your stop. That's not coincidence. 

That's algorithmic precision hunting the cluster you joined.

The round number sweep. Everyone's watching 1.1000 as resistance. Price pushes to 1.1005, triggers the stops sitting just above the round number, reverses hard. Retail thinks "the breakout failed." It didn't fail, it was never a breakout. 

It was a liquidity collection event targeting the predictable cluster.

The cascade. Price approaches 1.1000, hesitates, then violently spikes through it. That's not momentum. That's the algorithm triggering the first cluster of stops at 1.1000, using that liquidity to push to 1.1010 and trigger the next cluster, using that liquidity to push further. Each cluster of stops funds the next move. 

Your stop became fuel for someone else's position.

Most traders have experienced all three patterns dozens of times. 

They just didn't realize what they were watching.

They thought: "I need to place my stop further away."

The actual problem: "I need to stop placing my stop where algorithms are programmed to hunt."

What Changed for Me

I spent months convinced the solution was wider stops. 

Just give the trade more room. Let it breathe.

That didn't fix it. It just meant bigger losses when the same pattern happened with a wider stop.

Then I started tracking something specific: how often price hit major round numbers within 2 pips and immediately reversed.

EUR/USD at 1.1000. Gold at 1950.00. GBP/USD at 1.3000. 

Indices at round thousand marks.

Over 30 days of tracking, the pattern was mechanical. 

Round numbers got hunted with algorithmic precision. 

The stops sitting there got collected. The reversal happened immediately after.

So I changed one thing.

Instead of placing stops at 1.1000, I started using 1.1008 or 1.0993. 

Instead of 1950.00 on Gold, I'd use 1951.50 or 1948.20.

Not because those levels are magically safer. Because they're not where the cluster sits.

The algorithm hunts 1.1000 because that's where 90% of retail stops are stacked. When you offset by just a few pips from the round number, you're not in the primary liquidity pool getting swept.

Simple change. Immediate difference.

Not perfect, nothing is. 

But the number of times I got stopped out right before the reversal dropped significantly.

The Deeper Pattern You're Missing

Once you recognize this with round numbers, you start seeing it everywhere else algorithmic hunting happens.

Previous day highs and lows—everyone marks them, everyone places stops there, algorithms know this.

Equal highs and equal lows—those clean levels every retail trader circles on their chart and uses for stop placement.

Fibonacci extensions at exact levels like 1.618 or 2.0—another predictable cluster.

Swing highs and lows that everyone marks with horizontal lines.

The pattern is always the same: if retail traders are systematically trained to place stops at a specific level, algorithms are programmed to hunt that level.

It's not personal. It's not about your trade specifically. It's about the predictable clustering of retail positioning at obvious technical levels.

Your stop at 1.1000 isn't getting hunted because someone's targeting you. It's getting hunted because you placed it exactly where the algorithm knows thousands of other retail traders also placed theirs.

The liquidity indicator went offline for three weeks after TradingView's update. Just came back online, and lifetime access is still available here during this window before it goes back to monthly subscription.

What it shows isn't predictions about where price will go. It shows where stop clusters actually are. Where algorithmic sweeps are likely to hunt based on retail positioning patterns. Where you're stacking your stop in a high-density target zone versus where you're offset from the primary collection area.

The difference between a stop at 1.1000 and a stop at 1.1008 sounds trivial. But one is where the algorithm is specifically programmed to hunt and one isn't. That small offset is often the difference between getting swept before the move and surviving the sweep to catch the reversal you predicted.

The Fix is Simpler Than You Think

You don't need to abandon stop losses. You don't need to place them so far away that your risk-reward ratio falls apart.

You just need to stop putting them exactly where algorithms are designed to hunt.

Round numbers are the most obvious example, but the principle applies to any level where retail positioning clusters predictably. If you're placing your stop where everyone else is trained to place their stop, you're in the liquidity pool.

Offset from the obvious. Use 1.1008 instead of 1.1000. Use 1947.00 instead of 1950.00. 

Use previous day high + 4 pips instead of exactly at previous day high.

Not some advanced strategy. 

Just awareness of what you're doing when you join the predictable cluster versus when you deliberately avoid it.

Hope you found this helpful

Talk soon

Atif

Trading might make you rich if you survive the learning curve and avoid the algorithmic traps. Investing is what makes you wealthy after you've figured out how to stop funding institutional positions with your stops. Worth seeing what they've built.

Jumping into the stock market might seem intimidating with all its ups and downs, but it’s actually easier than you think. Today’s online brokerages make it simple to buy and trade stocks, ETFs, and options right from your phone or laptop. Many even connect you with experts who can guide you along the way, so you don’t have to figure it all out alone. Get started by opening an account from Money’s list of the Best Online Stock Brokers and start investing with confidence today.

Start investing

P.S. The referral program isn't limited to people you know personally. Your X followers, trading Discord servers, anyone tired of getting stopped at round numbers—send them here. Each referral moves you closer to free lifetime indicator access. Better than watching the counter sit at zero while you keep getting swept at 1.1000.