We've covered liquidity mechanics for months.
You understand sweeps. Fair value gaps. Institutional positioning.
I know you get the technical side because I see your messages.
Your charts. Your execution improving.
But there's something beyond technicals we need to discuss.
Been watching this pattern destroy profitable traders for years.
And if you're new here and don't know what sweeps or fair value gaps are yet, stick around.
You just found something most traders spend years looking for…
The Pattern Most Never See
Two weeks ago, grabbed coffee with a trader I know.
He was telling me about the three perfect sweeps he'd hit that week.
Textbook BSE from how he explained it.
$15k in four days executing exactly what we've discussed.
Gave it all back a week later.
The liquidity concepts were right. The execution was clean.
But something shifted after those wins.
Here's what four years of studying this business taught me.
Everyone focuses on managing losses. Controlling fear. Avoiding revenge trades.
Standard psychology stuff you've heard everywhere.
Even here
But after working with hundreds of traders, analyzing thousands of trades, there's something more dangerous.
Attachment.
How Institutional Traders Think
Spent time with a hedge fund trader in London last year.
Watched him book £2.3m profit on a position.
His reaction? Logged it. Closed the terminal. Went to lunch.
No celebration. No screenshot. No emotion.
I asked him about it.
"Attachment to outcomes creates bias. Bias creates blindness. Blindness creates losses."
He wasn't being cold. He was being clear.
When your identity gets tied to results, you stop seeing structure objectively.
The Neuroscience Behind It
There's behavioral research from MIT on this.
Your "I am" statements literally reshape neural pathways.
When your identity becomes "I am profitable" or "I am the trader who caught that move"...
Your brain starts filtering information to protect that identity.
You'll see setups that aren't there. Ignore risks that are obvious.
Not because you lack discipline.
Because your brain is protecting your self-concept.
Speaking of seeing things clearly when emotion isn't involved...
There's something fascinating happening in alternative markets right now. Assets completely disconnected from daily volatility. No charts to watch. No stops to manage.
The ultra-wealthy have been quietly moving capital into these spaces for decades. Not because they're exciting. Because they're predictable.
But what can you actually DO about the proclaimed ‘AI bubble’? Billionaires know an alternative…
Sure, if you held your stocks since the dotcom bubble, you would’ve been up—eventually. But three years after the dot-com bust the S&P 500 was still far down from its peak. So, how else can you invest when almost every market is tied to stocks?
Lo and behold, billionaires have an alternative way to diversify: allocate to a physical asset class that outpaced the S&P by 15% from 1995 to 2025, with almost no correlation to equities. It’s part of a massive global market, long leveraged by the ultra-wealthy (Bezos, Gates, Rockefellers etc).
Contemporary and post-war art.
Masterworks lets you invest in multimillion-dollar artworks featuring legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso—without needing millions. Over 70,000 members have together invested more than $1.2 billion across over 500 artworks. So far, 23 sales have delivered net annualized returns like 17.6%, 17.8%, and 21.5%.*
Want access?
Investing involves risk. Past performance not indicative of future returns. Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd
What Changed Everything
After three years of studying price action, order flow, market microstructure...
After understanding exactly how institutions move size, how algorithms hunt stops...
My biggest breakthrough wasn't technical.
Used to track P&L obsessively. Celebrate wins. Agonize over losses.
Same knowledge. Wildly different results based on emotional state.
Now every trade is just data.
Did the setup play out according to the framework? Yes or no.
No identity attached. No emotional residue.
The sweeps still happen where they should. The gaps still fill.
But I see them clearly because winning doesn't excite me anymore.
Neither does losing.
Just execution and observation.
The Application
You already know where liquidity sits.
You can spot sweeps before they happen.
You understand fair value gaps better than most.
But if excitement from a win clouds your next entry, none of that matters.
If fear from a loss makes you hesitate, knowledge is useless.
Detachment isn't about not caring.
It's about caring so much about execution that outcomes become irrelevant.
Talk soon,
Atif
P.S. Inside IFT I combine the technical frameworks you know with the psychological systems that make them executable. Four years of refining both sides. Because understanding liquidity means nothing if attachment controls your execution.
